Відео

Thanks for watching! Yes mostly all at 1.8. I was very pleasantly surprised by this lens especially considering its price. Let us know what you think about the 24mm!

@@FilmJams qulaity is great especially with sony a7siii , i own 2 a7siii cameras , planning to buy 35mm seeing this video

@@FilmJamswhich codec u filmed ? XAVCHS OR XAVC ? OR S-I

@@luckynaturerelaxationin8kI always try to shoot the I codec as it is easier to edit!

@@luckynaturerelaxationin8kawesome! Hope you enjoy it!

Absolutely they will work!

@@FilmJams Thanks. Have you ever tried?

Glad it helped! Thanks for watching your Film Jams!

For sure. We actually mention that in the video. You can also build it into a shirt like we talk about as well which is what a lot of productions I’ve been on have done.

Yo yo! Thanks for stopping by. Our latest film is called Mother Nature and the Doomsday Prepper. You can check out some BTS and updates on Instagram! @Mother_nature_movie

@@FilmJams Awesome!

Oooof good line

@@FilmJams Hahahaha

Awesome. Enjoy the ride! And watch your Film Jams. You’ll be fine!

Thanks for watching! I’m there with ya! If you want to buy our 23mm we decided to sell it lol. Couldn’t justify keeping both. But ya I love the look of the Mitakon. I’m hoping for a fisheye or ultra wide GFX lens myself one day!

Nice! Such a great lens. And good note…weather sealing is important! 😄📸

That's the spirit of Film Jams ol' boy! If you're uncomfortable, then you must be in the right place. And yes that is a follow focus in my pocket, but I'm also happy to see you!

Thanks for watching! You make some great observations. And I agree a very good value on the Rokes

Blurrin’ and purrin’ !

Thanks for watching! That’s why we do these videos to see what the real world results are. No color adjustments in post. These clips are straight OOC.

I agree! Wish we had shot more. Thanks for watching!

Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for watching!

Thanks! Luckily they make a cure for that. It’s called the 24-105 RF 2.8 😁📸

No it’s the Big FX. They’re different

Thanks for watching. It’s a great lens for sure!

Try Warp stabilizer

@@FilmJams Thanks. Warp stabilizer? Another gimbal, an add-on accessory, or an app? Never heard of it.

@@k16eya it’s in premiere if y Google it.

That was in the previous version. This one I didn’t have any issues yet.

Sadly INKEE discontinued these a year or so back. We added that link as it’s a similar product that we recommend.

I haven’t just the Apple case. Works great!

It’s one of the most underrated lenses! I agree. So nice! Thanks for stopping by the channel.

You’re welcome! Sigma is a nice lens too. It’s a lot heavier plus you must add the RF to EF adapter. For me the Canon is better for travel and using on a gimbal. But I think the Sigma is nice with the extra depth with its 1.4. If I wasn’t using on a gimbal or travel I would maybe get the Sigma. Also check on our channel we have a 35mm lens comparison where we compare them both side by side.

Here’s a link to that comparison: ua-cam.com/video/dL5MeCOeN_s/v-deo.htmlsi=60yDT5FZ72RK7Cn8

@@FilmJams in short, is canon rf a more versatile lens? so that you can shoot video, even handheld and take photos

Yes it’s certainly more versatile as it also has image stabilization whereas the Sigma does not.

Anytime! Glad it was helpful!

You’re welcome Dick!

Should work with the step up ring. But can’t guarantee it. Def make sure u can return. Just in case.

Dumbest comment ever ☝️

Appreciate it thanks! We edited in a 3840x2160 timeline.

Color at 2:36? Looks pretty close to me. Especially compared to other lenses I’ve shot side-by-side. As far as sharpness yes the s4 is sharper but sharpness isn’t always everything these days…with how sharp 8k sensors are I often soften my lenses anyway.

@@FilmJamsSorry. Your synopsis started with 'the biggest differences' and I skimmed through and saw 'color'. Thought to myself, "Color looked pretty close; At least way closer than edge resolution." Even flaring was pretty different... Either way, there's no way I'd take an SP3, wide open, on an establishing shot of anything. It's just not even close to the same caliber.

Ahh I see what you mean now. Yes the SP3 are certainly softer on the edges. Luckily I own the S4 and not the SP3s! 😆🎥👍 but like I said a lot of modern cameras are so sharp I don’t know that it’s as much a factor anymore. Everything looks too sharp to me these days. I like softer looking footage like my atlas anamorphics wide open. Love the creamy dreamy vibe. But certainly not for everything.

Thanks for watching! They certainly aren't for everyone, and lots of great choices out there these days.

Should have the info in the video

@@FilmJams No there isn't, but on the other hand there is a good interpretation of the Eagles

@@contemarculahaha sorry it’s been a while since we made this video. I thought it did. It might just be mic in only.

@@FilmJams Thanks! I wish you good luck with your channel

@@contemarculaappreciate it thanks!! 🙏

Thanks for watching. To me the lenses are pretty close in color to my eye. I’ve definitely seen some much more far off lenses used on even large Hollywood film productions. Colorists can work a lot of magic these days to match. I wouldn’t be worried about a little magenta cast. But that’s just me! I’m just Ken!

@@FilmJams ya I think so, the color correct wouldn’t be hard, just annoying. But most Hollywood movies would probably use these as crash cam lenses because no pl.

@@nicholasboule5134yeah for sure tho the Venice is pretty popular. And with the Burano now I imagine these might see some play. I’d prob still go for a PL myself tho !

@@FilmJams I’m just an old soul S4 maximalist too so there is that hahahaha

@@nicholasboule5134I hear you! Just shot a feature last month on old school Cooke S4 and Angenieux Optimo DP zooms. My tried and true lens combo!

U could use a fog machine or atmosphere spray cans… or hope there’s enough atmosphere in your location but likely won’t be as impactful rays.

From the comica

Thank you! Appreciate that 😃🎥✌️

The T stop is certainly one obvious thing and the E lens mount helps the SP3 reduce size too. Thanks for watching!

For sure. These def seemed designed for cameras like Komodo and Burano with native RF and E mounts. I imagine canon will announce an RF cinema camera soon too which will make these lenses work on many of the modern bodies including Venice.

Nice! What are your thoughts in comparison?

@@FilmJamsbetween the supremes? The supremes are just perfection of performance even wide open. We’ve been shooting them (nearly) wide open too much, and we’re gonna dial them down in the future with more time to light. The cookes have only been tested on the FX6 so far but they are incredibly stylized as you’ve seen. We are hoping Duclos develops the LPL mount for the cookes so they can mount to our Alexa mini LF. The one challenge I’ve seen is focus pulling on the small barrel diameter, but I think we should adjust the focus motors sensitivity to help mitigate that. I like that they’re T2.4 because a tac sharp wide open lens is still too shallow the vast majority of the time.

That’s why you always go for the Mithril bag! Lighter and readily available in Rivendell camera store!

It is but so helpful to have!

Haha! I don’t blame you 😂🎥🤘

Awesome! Glad to hear that!

You’re welcome! I imagine you could just might not have as much shallow depth.

Thanks Professa! Appreciate you stopping by the channel. 🎥👍😆

Unfortunately we don’t offer tech support for products we don’t make. I would recommend you reach out to the manufacturer’s support.

Both lenses are shot wide open to show how they perform at their shallowest aperture. For us this is how we shoot these lenses most commonly. As with most lenses there are much less differences when stopping down to say a T4 or a T8. It certainly was a tough choice for us. But ultimately we felt that filming them wide open was the most interesting comparison for us. I’m sure there are others out there that compare at difference t-stops. Either way…Thanks for stopping by!

@@FilmJams I would suggest you do both - show them wide open and then show them at the same T stop. Otherwise its still apples to oranges. Again, in no way is this meant to take away from the significant amount of work you put into making the video. Just one mans opinion. :)

@@MichaelsHiFiAdventures I hear ya! And thank you. I wish I had unlimited hours in the day to make Film Jams :)

Thanks for checking out the video. I agree that makes sense. Our lighting setup did not change...so one lens is rated higher it seems than the other.

@@FilmJams so much for T stops being an absolute value huh

Lots of different users with different needs and budgets. But I can appreciate that for you 3-4 frames is too high. Personally I own both high end Teradeks and lower end options all the way down to $100 wireless systems. Each has its place. And I use them all for different projects and budgets. Thanks for stopping by the channel!